Archive for the ‘ business ’ Category

Licensing Images


It’s one of the most commonly misunderstood parts of commercial photography, especially if you’re not dialed in – licensing. We’re not selling images or giving away pictures we are, like many businesses, licensing our wares. I get questions about this frequently and use the analogy of rental cars as being similar. That is, based on the size and specific use that the client requires a price can be formulated. Of course, that’s simplified but essentially if you figure in production and post production costs this works for stock and assignment uses.

There are resources available as well but until now it’s been very rare to find actual current figures. But breaking through the fog of various ranges and crazy spreedsheets detailing use ASMP has trumped everyone by assembling a generous group of pros and posting their actual invoices. It’s part of a new licensing guide in the ASMP’s business bible, Professional Practices in Photography. And if you don’t already have this and have parts of it memorized then now’s the time.

This new licensing guide was spearheaded by former ASMP president Susan Carr and includes over 50 examples of paperwork from recent jobs. The book’s not out until 2008 but the guide’s up online now. Only a small section is available if you’re not a member but still relevant info for the using. And props to all the contributing shooters: Dwight Cendrowski, Jim Flynn, Kim Kauffman, Chip Mitchell, Shawn Henry, & Colleen Woolpert.

The one thing I might add to the guide is the green line item for carbon offsets as an option for clients. If you are working with larger budgets especially, a few dollars to ‘green’ the production is usually not an issue. It leaves both you and your clients in good standing and aligned with modern business practices.

Coincidently just this am I got a call from a friend who was flying back to the valley on one of the major carriers and recognized her ski gear in a winter image. At first I was wondering if one of my agencies had turned out the image for the full page piece for the inflight mag. Then she mentioned it was an ad and I remembered the licensing agreement I had worked on with an agency. Turns out it’s one of a series of new ads I licensed – nice to know that it’s all square.

Share

How Much Would You Pay?

A real album for free. Well almost depending on your conscience and beliefs.

As fast as the photography world and creative fields are changing the music business has always seemed to be even more cutting edge. Vast number of platforms, huge catalog of material and not only has DRM (digital rights management) pushed itself into the conversation but so to has a wealth of sales and promotion models. Our micro stock and various layers of RF imagery seem largely based on models the music industry threw out first.

So as you may already know Radiohead released it’s first studio album (seventh overall), In Rainbows, free of their label EMI and have caused a stir. It’s downloadable direct from the band via their site and you decide what to pay. I’ve already seen responses on CNN ranging from why pay to $10 to $100. A bold and innovative move and will be interesting to see the response from both public and business sides.

On the same note Getty has recently put out their new music service, Pump Audio, as well. Pump existed years prior to the Getty takeover but why would the 1000 lb gorilla be moving into music. Is the model the same as imagery and they feel they can simply spread around creative content to the growing number of multimedia platforms regardless of the specific nature of the work itself?

And as I mentioned in a previous post Moby has moved into this terrain already as well. Through his site artists can apply to license tunes for non-profit work. Is this happening with images?

With the obvious correlation between business and distribution models between music and photography then is this a direction that we are headed. Who’s the first visual media-ist to stick their work out in the public domain for public use and pricing? Is there even any validity in this model? Does it only apply to large scale, known operators as they have a user/fan base already in place?

Speaking personally, when I get through to the download, I’m paying for sure. I want to see this work … and where it goes. How much … that may just determine how committed we are all.

Share